IS SHE WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE?
OR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
The Watchman
We know it’s early to be talking about candidates for the 2020 elections, but because of the circumstances we had to bring to light the incredibly dismal performance of Kendra Horn, (D), 5th District of Oklahoma. We wanted to present this information prior to the 208 elections, but her campaign finance reports were curiously missing from the Federal Election Commission. How she got elected and the sexist attitude of then Oklahoma GOP Chairman at the time, led to a male member of the legislature being disciplined by the party but the female legislature could get away with it. We did a story pointing to this matter a couple of months back.
We were surprised at that time of not being able to see who donated to her campaign. Federal Election and became Commission was void of any campaign records for Congresswoman Horn. That has stalled our investigation in her records.
The first place we looked was at her web page. You can read the page by going here Kendra Horn.
There really wasn’t much to see. It fails to disclose her voting record on things that matters to Oklahoman’s. This why she was elected.
We found her web page and were not surprised by the rhetoric. She claimed that Oklahoman’s are tired of partisan politics. Most people we know would tend to agree. She claims that we want common since legislation, which we too can agree. From what we have found, which you can see here, Congresswoman Horn’s voting record. You can see from the ad here this isn’t common since, it's Party PoliticsWe did a comparison with her voting record and her rhetoric. She has voted for every piece of legislation that is aimed at taking our freedoms away. This sounds like a party hack than anything else.
The next article we found of interest was on her Wikipedia page. She has worked within the federal government or politicians most of her life. This Wikipedia article is incomplete. We found this on BallotPedia.org, a brief history of her work record. Sadly, it does show that her name is well known in the District of Corruption.
We next went to her voting record to see how she was voting. You can see her record It’s to take off the labels and do what’s right for a change. I believe in public service not politics. Congress needs common sense lead to build bridges and find solutions to our most challenging problems. I’ve spent my career doing just that and I’m ready to fight for the entire 5th district. “Sorry folks, but she has made two misstatements in the one sentence. There is nothing in her records to indicate that she has been doing either one of the above.
We next went to www.votesmart.org. We once again found that her working experience was incomplete. You may see here is her biography page. Words are screaming to be able to tell the complete working history.
We next went to her voting record to see if she was living up to her campaign rhetoric and found only a straight down the line party before country vote. We did find it amazing that her only no vote was on a bill that she co-sponsored. We also saw a vote made by her this week that proves she’s not working for the 5th District. voted for mass amnesty to illegal immigrants including criminals and other assorted individuals. We were unable to get a response from her or her office on this bill. We do not see how mass amnesty is going to help the country much less the 5th District. This we hope, never gets through the Senate.
We did go to the ratings and endorsement section, and were not surprised to see that she had only her one pre-election rating. That one rating was from the NRA. You could be safe in calling her a gun grabber.
We next looked at her campaign finance reports. We found it odd that when we checked earlier this year, we found nothing. You can see her campaign finance report here. Nothing surprising was found here. It is pretty well known that the Democrats get a lot of unions and the like to every campaign.
Now she didn’t have a big margin in her victory over her opponent Steve Russell. She won by a slim 4,000 votes. According to an article in the Tulsa World, she was already known in D.C. Her incomplete work record indicates that. The surprise came in finding out same she was a lobbyist working in a congressional office where she already worked. Talk about an ultimate insider, they don’t get much closer to it than this.
The next article of interest we found was where she claims to think of the 5th district. We would like to know which state the 5th district is in that she thinks about. It’s not Oklahoma. Her voting record proves that.
We found a statement in the same article listed as “A Republican insider told the reporter that she was going to make a good Congresswoman. Now we do know who that Republican insider is. She happens to be a State Representative from the Tulsa area. She would happen to be the same individual who was not disciplined by the State GOP while a male colleague was.
We next went to the Federal Elections Commission to look at her campaign finance reports. After comparing the reports from the FEC and VorteSmart, we noticed different amounts had been reported. This being the case, we must ask why the difference between two watchdog groups. Was everything actually reported? We don’t know what or how much was actually spent on this campaign.
There is only one conclusion to the deceit the residents of District 5 went through during the campaign season was one of epic proportions. This Congresswoman, with the aide of a Republican State Representative, won by the skin of her teeth. There is little to be said about her ability to tell a falsehood. Her deceit has shown her to be the ultimate insider in Washington swamp. There are things that the new Stat GOP Chair could do. Not much, but he could see to it that the Republican legislator be disciplined. We would also recommend that she not receive any financial support or any recognition from the State GOP when she makes a run for re-election.
We present these facts to you so you would be aware and to see that the State GOP Chair are able to spend more time to recruit quality candidates for office. We expect to see less discrimination between the sexes when disciplining is involved. Favoritism is never alright.
No comments:
Post a Comment